Title on Ballot: Veterans Disabled Due To Combat Injury; Homestead Property Tax Discount
Sponsor/Originator: The Florida Legislature
What it would do:
This amendment would allow certain disabled veterans, who were not Florida residents prior to entering military service, to qualify for a discount on their property taxes.
If You Vote Yes:
A “yes” vote means you want the state to give a property tax discount to disabled veterans who moved to Florida after entering the military.
If You Vote No:
A “no” vote means you do not want to extend the tax discount to disabled veterans who moved to Florida after entering the military.
Click here to visit the Florida Division of Elections Background on Amendment 2 (including full text of the amendment)
Summary of Amendment (from Division of Elections site):
Proposing an amendment to Section 6 of Article VII and the creation of Section 32 of Article XII of the State Constitution to expand the availability of the property discount on the homesteads of veterans who became disabled as the result of a combat injury to include those who were not Florida residents when they entered the military and schedule the amendment to take effect January 1, 2013.
Arguments for:
Supporters say this amendment will benefit older veterans who were injured in combat but did not live in Florida at the time they entered the military. They say the property tax discount can help with medical bills and may allow veterans to stay in their homes longer as they age. It might also stimulate the housing market by persuading veterans to move to Florida.
Arguments against:
Opponents say state and local governments face mounting budget shortfalls in part because of diminished property tax returns brought about by the collapse of the housing market. Schools and local governments need to maintain the tax base or consider cuts to public services.
Should disabled veterans who move to Florida get a property tax discount?
Amendment 2 relaxes the eligibility requirements for an existing property tax discount offered to disabled veterans. Currently, disabled veterans who meet the following four requirements are eligible for a property tax discount commensurate with the degree of their disability: 1) current Florida resident; 2) 65 or older; 3) disabled in combat; 4) Florida resident when they entered the military. If passed, Amendment 2 would eliminate that fourth eligibility requirement.
As an example of how the current disability discount works, a veteran eligible for the discount with a 50 percent disability can claim 50 percent off the assessed value of his home. Roughly 1,200 veterans received that discount in 2010, allowing them to subtract, on average, $24,000 from their home’s value before property taxes were calculated.
This proposed amendment would give that same tax break to veterans, age 65 and older, who were disabled in combat but living in another state when they entered the military so long as they now claim Florida residency. It is difficult to estimate how many disabled veterans would qualify for the discount under the relaxed standards, but the state estimates that the tax revenues school districts and local governments would lose if Amendment 2 passes is roughly $15 million combined over the first three years.
State lawmakers say the cost is worth it. “This bill provides relief to our state’s aging combat-injured veterans,” state Sen. Mike Bennett, R-Bradenton, said in a press release. “Our older veterans made great sacrifices for our country, although many did not live in the Sunshine State at the time they entered the military. As they age and struggle with service-related disabilities, this bill will help alleviate their financial challenges.”
The measure won unanimous approval in the state Senate and House. There is no known organized opposition to the proposed amendment. As with all proposed amendments, passage requires the approval by 60 percent or more of the voters. If passed, Amendment 2 goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2013.
Current Law
Florida has a long history of offering property tax breaks to its permanent residents. One of those tax breaks allows a homeowner to claim a $50,000 tax exemption on their primary residence, what is commonly known as a homesteaded property. That amount is subtracted from the assessed value of the home before property taxes are calculated, thereby reducing the tax bill. This form of tax relief is reserved for primary residences, meaning the owner must live in the home the majority of the year and not claim any other residence as a primary residence.
Additionally, the state offers several property tax breaks to military veterans disabled while in the service:
- Veterans of any age with at least a 10 percent disability incurred while in active military service (no matter where they lived when they entered the military) can deduct $5,000 from the value of their property before taxes are calculated (in addition to the $50,000 exemption offered to all owners of homesteaded property).
- As mentioned earlier, disabled veterans 65 and over who were Florida residents when they entered the military can also receive a tax break equal to the percentage of their disability (in addition to the $50,000 homestead exemption and the $5,000 disability exemption for those eligible for both).
- And veterans with a service-related, total (100 percent) and permanent disability are eligible for total relief from all property taxes on their primary residence.
As an example of how these current tax breaks might apply, a veteran with a primary residence assessed at $200,000 who was a Florida resident when he entered the military and who is 65 or older with a 50 percent disability related to combat, could claim $55,000 in exemptions and claim 50 percent off the remaining $145,000 assessed value, resulting in an assessment on that property for tax purposes of $72,500.
Estimated Impact
According to a Florida House of Representatives’ staff analysis, 1,206 veterans received the discount on property taxes equal to their combat-related disability in 2010, amounting to a combined discount of $28,749,630. On average, the discount allowed those disabled vets to subtract $23,839 from their home’s value before property taxes were calculated.
It is difficult to say how many disabled veterans would be eligible for the property tax discount if Amendment 2 passes and expands the law to include those who moved here from other states. According to the House of Representatives’ analysis, there were 77,535 veterans in Florida age 65 and older receiving compensation for service-related conditions in 2010. However, “the number of veterans in this population who were 65 or older by exact disability rating percentage category, the number who were Florida residents at the time of entry into military service and the number of veterans whose compensation is the result of combat are indeterminate at this time,” the staff analysis said.
According to the state’s Revenue Estimating Conference (REC), if passed Amendment 2’s estimated impact on school taxes during fiscal year 2013-14 would be a combined $1.1 million in school districts across the state, $2.3 million in fiscal year 2014-15, and $3.6 million in fiscal year 2015-16. That’s an estimate of the combined revenue school districts would not collect if the amendment passes.
If passed, the impact on non-school property tax revenues is expected to be $1.3 million in fiscal year 2013-14, $2.6 million in 2014-15, and $4 million in 2015-16, the REC estimates. That’s an estimate of the combined revenue local government agencies that levy property taxes would not collect if the amendment passes.
IF YOU VOTE YES:
A “yes” vote means you want the state to give a property tax discount to disabled veterans who moved to Florida after entering the military.
IF YOU VOTE NO:
A “no” vote means you do not want to extend the tax discount to disabled veterans who moved to Florida after entering the military.
___________________________________________
I don’t really understand this. Veterans with a service-connected disability already get a discount. I’m sure a combat-disability is considered service connected. So what’s different? I’d vote NO just because it’s not clear.
God bless disabled veterans, however, the state of Florida should not give this reduction for non residents. If they were native Floridians or were living in the state when enlisting or drafted, yes!
Sorry you feel this way,
Thanks for having God bless us , but I would like to say on behalf of all Viet- Nam vets that is was not the state where we lived that drafted us and called us to duty it was our country! If what you say becomes law then that is nothing short of discrimination!
I am a 100% totaly disabled combat vet ,and if I am tossed out, then my faith in humanity will go right down the drain!
This could not possibly have been more heflpul!
Although this is a noble idea, there are two things that will cause me to vote “No” for this amendment. First and foremost the loss of property tax revenue will only serve to burden other property owners (non-veterans) with additional taxes since it’ hard to cut government spending. Secondly, there are benefits of being a resident of Florida let’s keep those benefits for the folks that were Floridia residents at the time of their enlistment/combat injury. Vote No. CWO-3 USMC(Ret.)
We all sacrificed,no matter where you lived,Wake up,CWO-3 USMC (retired)
Voting YES will encourage disabled vets to move to Florida which will stimulate our struggling housing market. Any bill favorable to Vets is a good bill. We offered our lives for this country. Tax exemption is the least Florida should do. Most affected vets are Vietnam Vets and we were put through enough upon returning. Time to come forward in our behalf.
I agree. It’s the least we can do to give back to our Vets. If they move to Florida, they should have the same exemption as other Vets that already live here. This is a no brainer as far as I’m concerned.
Thank you,Janis
Disabled Vets deserve all we can provide them.
Thank you ,Stan
This amendment deserves a yes vote. There is no other group in the state and country that deserves our gratitude.
Thanks to our Veterans service, we live safe & free on the land we own….
This is a no brainer, I will be voting ‘yes’ on this amendment!!
You have got to be kidding me Our Vetrans deserve this and so much more. Property values are only rated higher on new construction or new sales anyway. Florida would benefit more ways than one, from having veterans take advantage of the property tax breaks. I hope this passes and they all move here.
Um, No.
Shouldn’t we write amendments to indirectly “benefit their healthcare”?
That argument is invalid because this amendment is about stimulating growth in the housing industry and bringing more disabled veterans here to live, and not about providing them healthcare coverage. I’m not entirely sure that moving to Florida is a great idea as without adequate healthcare coverage some of these servicemen and servicewomen will be in more of a financial pickle than they were in states where the cost of housing, the cost of land, and the cost of home insurance is significantly lower to begin with.
Not all veterans are older and have ownership of their home. Plenty young men and women coming home from Iraq find themselves disabled and homeless or living with their parents. This does nothing to serve them either.
Write a bill that directly benefits disabled veterans without discriminating against those who do not own their own homes and I might say yes.
But no on this one. Let our native born-and-bred Floridians keep their current service benefits for their state. Let other states decide for themselves.
This proposed amendment insults veterans. What difference does it make if where the veteran entered the armed forces to serve his/her country. The bill should only limit those vets that live full time in Florida. I can’t see granting a “snow bird” a homestead tax discount if he/she only lives in the state for three months.
Felix It is apparent that you never served your country.
F>R.D. former U.S.Army Korean war vet.
Thank you Felix
When these vets went into service they did not fight for a particular state. They served for their and our whole country. How could you not allow them a discount for all they have done for YOU.” Hard to cut government spending?” aren’t you cutting back? So should the government. Vote yes for our boys (men).
Thank you Marie
I agree. Here is my definition of a Veteran.
A Veteran is a person who writes a blank check to the United States of America for an amount up to and including his or her own life. I believe that the veteran has given more than enough to our country,and it is time for our country(including FLOIDA) to repay the veteran for the sacrifices they have made.
Thank you Leo
Vets deserve the extra consideration. However, this should have been handled as a part of the regular legislation process not requiring an Amendment to the Constitution. Perhaps the fact that the initial legislation passed in Nov. 2006 as a constitutional amendment (Amendment 7) requires this action to amend the original law. Constitutional amendments should be few and limited to the most significant issues. Regular legislation items such as this should be handled by the legislators we elect.
I enlisted in Georgia in 1969. Went tp flight school in Pensacola and have been a Florida resident ever since. Fortunately i survived 24 years active duty with no injuries …. but if i had, I’m a Florida guy through and through. Check my property tax bill to prove it. But, requiring a constitutional amendment seems ridiculous.
- ams
Here here. But here it is. I have a hard time believing enough vets outside Florida will move here because of this amendment to stimulate the housing market as suggested in any appreciable way, so the question now is whether or not the benefit to veterans outweighs the projected loss in state revenue. My thought is there are better ways to honor and support our vets without putting so much strain on the present and future budget.
As a Veteran you put your life on the line every single day for our country and now the State does not think we desrve the tax breaks
You got that right Caton . The ones who are against giving us are due are nobodys
Thank you Caton
Veterans’ sacrifices should be valued equitably. Benefits should not be based on where a veteran enlisted and later chose to reside. BUT, this matter should not be a constitutional amendment. Our lawmakers can vote on it and write it into law through the normal legislative process, can’t they?
Why is this a constitutional amendment? This is more of a plain taxing issue. They give additional exemptions to widows, etc all the time. Constitutional Amendments should be for things that affect all of our rights. This issue can be taken up with simple legislation. This kinda smells of political expediancy on someones part.
I am in TOTAL agreement with Stan – Vets need all the help they can get. We can pinch pennies in other areas, starting with the Gov., state employees/”handouts”, etc.
I am a vet. For those that aren’t and don’t see the benefit of having more vets move here, just remember this: Vets buy things, they go to restaurants, improve their homes, buy cars, …etc. From a purely monetary tradeoff, this is a no-brainer. I’d rather that money go to local businesses than let the “government” squander it. Yes on 2!
As a disabled veteran myself, I both agree and disagree. Of course most people, especially those that are retired and/or on a limited income, would think this is great. I do as well. However, I think the bill should be amended to say “if you are released/retired from service while residing or stationed in the state of Florida” that the combat discount should apply. There are a lot of veterans out there and they would be flocking to Florida if they didn’t have to pay taxes. I think the state is already in bad enough shape with the crowded housing, poor schools, and the drugs! And don’t get me started on the FCAT testing. What happened to standardized testing like the “Iowa Testing of Basic Skills” that tests a students all-around knowledge. Not just if they can do a little math, write an essay, and read a story. I want my kids to be taught not drilled on how to pass the FCAT. OOPS! That is a lot of revenue to be throwing away just because the state wants to increase property sales.
I Will Be Voting Yes On This. These Men And Women Have Put Their Life On The Line For Us The Least WeCan Do Is Give Them Another Discount Who Care If Home Owner Might Have To Pay A Little. Ore They Didn’t Think Twice Before They Put Their Life on The Line ForUs.
YES of course! A complete no brainier. Has such a minimal impact on state budget. It’s wise not to even consider trivial issues. Explain to a combat disabled vet, one arm, no legs, part of his stomach gone….I could go on….that even though you have minimal income to survive on, your quality of life is no longer there, due to parochial thinkers, you now have to pay tax on your small shelter you’ve provided yourself.
I’m a retired Vietnam era vet . On a daily basis I see persons being given innumerable freebies and , for the most part from what I see , they’re undeserving. I can’t quote a percentage but the most common denominator is they did nothing extracurricular yet they expect someone else to pay for their freebies. Any disabled vet deserves all the help we can give as they ultimately paid the price for all the “supposed ” heroes that never volunteered for anything with regard to their country and will complain incessantly regarding those who did. In this day /age it amazes me that the younger generation still voluntarily enlist despite seeing how the general public seems to hold the military in such disdain . So, I vote a resounding YES!
Felix – if someone only lives in Florida for 3 months can they claim to be a Florida resident? This amendment is not for “snowbirds”. It is for residents of hte state of FL. Right now you had to be a resident of the state before you entered the military to get the tax break. This amendment will fix it so ALL FL residents who are disabled vets get the tax break even if they didn’t live in FL before they joined the service.
Ken and Cheryl – I’m with you – this should not be an amendment to our Constitution. I don’t think any of the amendments they are trying to pass need to be amendments!
All these comments about legislative process are baloney, it happens to appear as an amendment! Vote on its merits regardless of the process of how it got before us. P.S. to Felix if you took the trouble to read the proposal it requires the recipient to be a current Florida RESIDENT hence your snow bird comment is also part of the above baloney trying to defeat a well deserved benefit to our disabled vets.
Many good statements above. However, stats show that a small percentage of Americans served their country in the military and in a time of war. What is it now? Less than 5%? Additonally, our Vets have suffered many hardships during their careers and just from service related disablities. They and their families have often been forced by the NEEDS OF OUR COUNTRY, to pack up and move from their home and other family members and move to other States and other countries many times during their careers. When I came in to the service many states were miliatry friendly. Today, few states are miliatry friendly, just look at all the base closures around the country. Florida is one of the LAST Military FRIENDLY States. Lets keep it that way for those who served this Nation and want to make Florida their home and to be Floridians.
Yes , but why does it have to be a Constitutional Amendment ? Why not a law? Amendments are hard to reverse. Politicians are fond of using the stapler and I’m not sure what else is attached to this amendment. I would be more in favor of law not an Amendment.
God bless our Vets. They deserve any support we can give them. Many have wounds invisible to the eye that may never be healed.
I’m voting yes!
All should get the tax discount no matter where they lived when entering the service.
And do they have to wait until the age of 65 to get this exemption?